An independent financial watchdog

El Paso Tax Watch

Every dollar. Every department. Sourced.

The public record, ready to report.

Branded graphics, source-backed briefs and exact data for newsrooms, independent journalists and community publishers.

Clear visuals.
Traceable numbers.

Download a publication-ready graphic or embed a living series. Follow every number back to its original record.

Graphics library

Free editorial reuse with the Tax Watch branding, reporting period, source and caveats intact. No implied endorsement. Original source documents remain subject to their publishers’ terms.

Featured order follows publication of changed evidence or design—not a daily rotation. All previous editions stay available below. SVGs are static; embeds use one brief, reduced-motion-aware entrance effect.

AUDITED GENERAL FUND · FY2025Fiscal year ended August 31, 2025

City General Fund: budget vs actual

City General Fund: budget vs actual. Exact figures and source pages follow below.
Download SVGExact data CSVEvidence pack JSON

Evidence pack includes chart rows, PDF pages, source URL/hash, methodology, summaries and edition ID; it does not bundle the source PDF.

Embed this graphic

This edition remains unchanged, even after newer records arrive. Check revision notes before reuse. Embeds contain no analytics scripts or cookies. Hosting still receives ordinary web requests.

Open embed

Responsive width; adjust the iframe height for your layout. The data table remains scrollable inside the frame.

Reporting brief, source and accessible table

Short factual summary

For FY2025, audited General Fund current-year resources were $394,907 below the final budget, while charges to appropriations were $6,481,612 above final appropriations. The schedule reports an ending fund balance of $161,616,210.

Resumen: En el año fiscal 2025, los recursos auditados del Fondo General fueron $394,907 menores que el presupuesto final, mientras que los cargos a las asignaciones superaron las asignaciones finales por $6,481,612. El saldo final del fondo fue $161,616,210.

Question to pursue: Which departments and budget amendments explain the difference, and how much was planned use of fund balance?

Limit: General Fund only. “Charges to appropriations” are budget-basis outflows, not every City expense or a cash checkbook. Variances alone do not establish mismanagement.

Exact values as published
Entity / measureValuePDF page
Resources · final budget$599,734,907159
Resources · actual$599,340,000159
Charges · final budget$599,734,908160
Charges · actual$606,216,520160

City of El Paso FY2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report · Source retrieved 2026-10-09 UTC

Values are transcribed from the audited General Fund budget-to-actual schedule on PDF pages 159–160 (printed pages 109–110).

Source SHA-256: 459cb4a9be9f0bbc8272b9257d6fcb2cbd420c2558c7d7940218e7de2fab62b9

ADOPTED CITY RATE · NOT A TAX BILLFY2017–FY2026

A decade of City property-tax rates

A decade of City property-tax rates. Exact figures and source pages follow below.
Download SVGExact data CSVEvidence pack JSON

Evidence pack includes chart rows, PDF pages, source URL/hash, methodology, summaries and edition ID; it does not bundle the source PDF.

Embed this graphic

This edition remains unchanged, even after newer records arrive. Check revision notes before reuse. Embeds contain no analytics scripts or cookies. Hosting still receives ordinary web requests.

Open embed

Responsive width; adjust the iframe height for your layout. The data table remains scrollable inside the frame.

Reporting brief, source and accessible table

Short factual summary

The City of El Paso budget book shows the published property-tax rate rising through FY2020, remaining at that level through FY2022, and then declining through FY2026. A lower rate does not necessarily mean a lower tax bill.

Resumen: El libro presupuestario de la Ciudad muestra que la tasa publicada subió hasta el año fiscal 2020, se mantuvo hasta 2022 y luego bajó hasta 2026. Una tasa menor no necesariamente significa una factura menor.

Question to pursue: How did taxable values, exemptions and overlapping taxing entities change during the same period?

Limit: A tax rate is not a tax bill. Property values, exemptions and overlapping taxing entities affect what a household pays.

Exact values as published
Entity / measureValuePDF page
FY20170.7597 per $100 valuation92
FY20180.8034 per $100 valuation92
FY20190.8433 per $100 valuation92
FY20200.9073 per $100 valuation92
FY20210.9073 per $100 valuation92
FY20220.9073 per $100 valuation92
FY20230.8624 per $100 valuation92
FY20240.8189 per $100 valuation92
FY20250.7614 per $100 valuation92
FY20260.7596 per $100 valuation92

City of El Paso FY2026 Budget Book · Source retrieved 2026-10-09 UTC

Rates are transcribed from the City budget book chart on PDF page 92 (printed page 89), using the four-decimal values as published.

Source SHA-256: ec729d5bdc93d71406381b41d6a9e19f45876abf23ce80a374ff767a8641e55f

CERTIFIED VALUE · NOT SPENDINGTax year 2026

Selected water-district tax bases

Selected water-district tax bases. Exact figures and source pages follow below.
Download SVGExact data CSVEvidence pack JSON

Evidence pack includes chart rows, PDF pages, source URL/hash, methodology, summaries and edition ID; it does not bundle the source PDF.

Embed this graphic

This edition remains unchanged, even after newer records arrive. Check revision notes before reuse. Embeds contain no analytics scripts or cookies. Hosting still receives ordinary web requests.

Open embed

Responsive width; adjust the iframe height for your layout. The data table remains scrollable inside the frame.

Reporting brief, source and accessible table

Short factual summary

Selected water districts have separate certified taxable values. Their jurisdictions can overlap other taxing entities; these amounts must not be added to municipal or county values.

Resumen: Los distritos de agua seleccionados tienen bases gravables independientes. Sus jurisdicciones pueden superponerse con otras entidades; no se deben sumar estos valores a los municipales o del condado.

Question to pursue: Which parcels and services belong to each district? Verify district boundaries before making neighborhood comparisons.

Limit: Taxable value is not tax revenue or spending. Overlapping entities must not be summed.

Exact values as published
Entity / measureValuePDF page
LWR VALLEY WTR D$4,869,713,312617
HORIZON MUD$3,389,934,451589
EP COUNTY WC & ID #4$250,131,299575
EP COUNTY TORNILLO WTR DIST$155,914,843631
HCNDS DEL NRTE WD$154,140,192603

2026 EPCAD Certified Totals (with Exemption Amounts) · Source retrieved 2026-10-08 UTC

Entity-level certified totals parsed from EPCAD's official PDF. Values are taxing-entity aggregates, not parcel, owner, address, or district records.

Source SHA-256: 0ab0e6c29406c5a9a24f081c3a6a4fcdb48bfc0c4b342438bf89613290eb2436

CERTIFIED VALUE · NOT SPENDINGTax year 2026

Market value is not taxable value

Market value is not taxable value. Exact figures and source pages follow below.
Download SVGExact data CSVEvidence pack JSON

Evidence pack includes chart rows, PDF pages, source URL/hash, methodology, summaries and edition ID; it does not bundle the source PDF.

Embed this graphic

This edition remains unchanged, even after newer records arrive. Check revision notes before reuse. Embeds contain no analytics scripts or cookies. Hosting still receives ordinary web requests.

Open embed

Responsive width; adjust the iframe height for your layout. The data table remains scrollable inside the frame.

Reporting brief, source and accessible table

Short factual summary

EPCAD reports $77.81B in certified market value and $57.13B in certified taxable value for the City of El Paso. The difference is not a measure of lost revenue or spending.

Resumen: El valor de mercado certificado y el valor gravable certificado son medidas distintas. La diferencia no equivale a ingresos perdidos ni a gasto público.

Question to pursue: What explains the difference? Consult exemption and valuation schedules before attributing it to any policy.

Limit: Taxable value is not tax revenue or spending. Overlapping entities must not be summed.

Exact values as published
Entity / measureValuePDF page
Certified market value$77,808,137,84551
Certified taxable value$57,133,453,60751

2026 EPCAD Certified Totals (with Exemption Amounts) · Source retrieved 2026-10-08 UTC

Entity-level certified totals parsed from EPCAD's official PDF. Values are taxing-entity aggregates, not parcel, owner, address, or district records.

Source SHA-256: 0ab0e6c29406c5a9a24f081c3a6a4fcdb48bfc0c4b342438bf89613290eb2436

CERTIFIED VALUE · NOT SPENDINGTax year 2026

Municipal taxable property base

Municipal taxable property base. Exact figures and source pages follow below.
Download SVGExact data CSVEvidence pack JSON

Evidence pack includes chart rows, PDF pages, source URL/hash, methodology, summaries and edition ID; it does not bundle the source PDF.

Embed this graphic

This edition remains unchanged, even after newer records arrive. Check revision notes before reuse. Embeds contain no analytics scripts or cookies. Hosting still receives ordinary web requests.

Open embed

Responsive width; adjust the iframe height for your layout. The data table remains scrollable inside the frame.

Reporting brief, source and accessible table

Short factual summary

Certified taxable property values differ widely across El Paso County municipalities. These figures describe the tax base, not taxes collected, budgets, or household bills.

Resumen: Los valores catastrales gravables certificados varían entre los municipios. Representan la base gravable, no la recaudación, los presupuestos ni las facturas de los hogares.

Question to pursue: How do exemptions, valuation changes and adopted rates affect each municipality’s revenue? These totals alone cannot answer that question.

Limit: Taxable value is not tax revenue or spending. Overlapping entities must not be summed.

Exact values as published
Entity / measureValuePDF page
CITY OF EL PASO$57,133,453,60751
CITY OF SOCORRO$2,621,097,41194
HORIZON CITY$1,772,919,63066
CITY OF SAN ELIZARIO$400,370,92380
TOWN OF ANTHONY$291,854,12221
VILLAGE OF VINTON$231,307,805108
TOWN OF CLINT$138,742,33735

2026 EPCAD Certified Totals (with Exemption Amounts) · Source retrieved 2026-10-08 UTC

Entity-level certified totals parsed from EPCAD's official PDF. Values are taxing-entity aggregates, not parcel, owner, address, or district records.

Source SHA-256: 0ab0e6c29406c5a9a24f081c3a6a4fcdb48bfc0c4b342438bf89613290eb2436

New editions & revision trail

This is a publication log, not a feed of newly enacted government decisions. Frozen editions are preserved. A new edition can reflect changed data or presentation; compare its evidence pack before reporting a change.

No press-asset corrections have been recorded at launch. Submit a documented correction.

From lead to evidence

Localize the story

Explore council-district and county-precinct project records. These graphics show taxing entities, not those political districts.

District explorer →

Check the next decision

Review the meeting watch and original agendas. Reconfirm hearing dates, comment rules and deadlines with the agency before publication.

Agendas and meeting watch →

Know the evidence status

Proposed is not approved. Approved is not paid. A discovered document is not a verified claim. Do not sum overlapping entities.

Verification methodology →

New source findings

Official entry points for records and agency contact details. These are not verified press-officer contacts.

El Paso County 911 District finances and meeting records

Budgets, service fees, audit and board documents. The finance page lists FY25 budget and FY23 audit, but the September 2026 meeting archive links an FY27 approved budget. Check both indexes and document dates; no actual payment totals are inferred.

El Paso Transportation Authority financial and service plans

Financial statements, annual reports, financial plans and contribution allocations alongside service studies. Preserve the named reporting entity and fiscal year; upload dates are not reporting periods. Plans, partner contributions and audited expenses must not be summed as separate spending.

Lower Valley Water District financial and procurement indexes

Official audited-financial-report and purchasing entry points, including document links in the public menu script. Dynamic board and purchasing records still require separate review; an award is not a payment and an accessible shell does not establish current coverage.

Search all official sources · Public-records request log · Corrections and tips

What still requires reconciliation

The lookup desk now routes individual addresses to the official combined bill and exposes verified capital-related County checks. Named-project payment totals remain unavailable when the register omits a project ID; those rows are marked unassigned rather than matched by guesswork. The City rate history does not estimate a household bill, and the General Fund comparison does not represent all City spending.

Follow the evidence

RSS for new graphic editions is automatic on publication. Email alerts below remain manually curated and topic-based; entity-specific delivery is not yet available.